Discoveries of new species continue to be reported regularly in scientific journals and the popular media, but how distinct are these new species from known species? In a new paper led by Deon Lum, a former research assistant in our lab, we explored this question for birds. We drew on multiple existing sources to build a robust avian phylogenetic tree, and explored how much each discovery of a new bird species over the last 250 years has added to our knowledge of phylogenetic diversity.
Our main finding is that newly discovered species are increasingly similar to known species. Around the turn of the 19th century, novel species discoveries included the Tawny Frogmouth and the Australian Owlet-nightjar, each of which represented a new taxonomic order and contributed roughly 60 Myr to known phylogenetic diversity at the time. In contrast, the most novel discoveries in recent decades have contributed only about 10% as much to our knowledge. One exception proves the rule: the discovery of the Udzungwa Forest Partridge in the 1990s was by far the most novel species in recent decades, but its novel contribution to known phylogenetic diversity was only about 20 Myr—one third that of the earliest decades’ most novel species. We conclude that our knowledge of the avian tree of life is mostly complete.
According to the stress-gradient hypothesis, mutualistic interactions between species can become stronger in harsher environments. For example, mosquito larvae in water-filled tree hollows can benefit from the presence of beetle larvae—the beetle larvae shred leaves into smaller pieces that the mosquito larvae can consume—and the benefit is greater when the environment is harsher, i.e., when there is less overall leaf litter available. In a previous study, we failed to find theoretical support for the stress-gradient hypothesis in a mathematical consumer–resource model. But in a new study, we show that the stress-gradient hypothesis can hold if there is a sufficient leakage rate of the downstream resource (the small pieces of leaves in the mosquito larvae example). We additionally show that our previous results are robust to the precise mathematical assumptions about how a species’ consumption rate increases with resource availability.
The new study was led by undergraduate student Sim Hong Jhun, and came out of his Honours project, which was supervised by Lam Weng Ngai (now at Nanyang Technological University) and Chong Kwek Yan (now at the National Parks Board, Singapore). The paper has just been published in the Journal of Theoretical Biology:
Three new students have joined the lab this month. Angelica See is a new PhD student, who recently completed her undergraduate degree in ecology at Nanyang Technological University. Her thesis research will focus on the effects of habitat fragmentation on tropical ecosystems. Kong Fanhua is a visiting PhD student from East China Normal University, where she is supervised by He Fangliang. She is studying species coexistence using empirical and theoretical approaches, and will be with us for two years. Nicholas Foong is an undergraduate student who will be doing his Honours project on global patterns of mangrove diversity. Welcome all!
Ecological communities are universally subject to temporal environmental stochasticity—random variation in environmental conditions over time that cause species’ vital rates to change. This can have both positive and negative effects on species richness. For example, negative effects can arise because stochasticity makes a species more vulnerable to extinction, whereas positive effects can arise because stochasticity reduces the strength of competition between species. Is the net effect on species richness typically negative or positive, and what mechanisms typically dominate? Answering this question is of paramount importance for our understanding of the effects of temporally varying environments on biodiversity. In a study just published in Oikos, Tak and Ryan together with James O’Dwyer from the University of Illinois tackled this topic using a novel mathematical approach that unified past models of temporal environmental stochasticity and generated new insights.
Our novel approach was to focus on one species and approximate the rest of the multispecies community as a single entity, thus converting a many-body problem into a one-body problem and greatly simplifying the mathematics. We developed methods for separating the effects of temporal environmental stochasticity into population-level effects and community-level effects, and found that the strength and direction of these effects varied in complex and surprising ways as a function of temporal correlation in the environmental stochasticity.
Our most tantalising result was that there is a threshold value of temporal correlation above which the net effect of temporal environmental stochasticity on species richness switches from positive to negative. The threshold is approximately twice the reciprocal of the rate at which new species enter the community. This points the way to a practical method for assessing whether temporal environmental stochasticity has a net positive or negative effect on biodiversity in reality, although further theoretical work is needed to test the generality of our result.
MacArthur & Wilson’s (1967) classic theory of island biogeography predicts that island species richness arises from an equilibrium between immigration and extinction, with islands further from a mainland receiving fewer immigrants and thus having lower species richness. A twist on the basic paradigm occurs for land-bridge islands, i.e., islands that were previously connected to a mainland. Such islands may exhibit more species than expected if insufficient time has passed for the immigration–extinction equilibrium to be reached. For example, in Baja California more lizard species are found on islands that have become isolated more recently in geological time (Wilcox 1978).
In a paper just published in the Journal of Biogeography, we explored whether this effect exists for birds on the islands of Sundaland. The project was led by Keita Sin, a former Honours student in Frank Rheindt’s lab, who created a database of bird diversity on 94 of these islands, from both published inventories and his own field work. We tested whether shelf islands, which have been connected to major landmasses at various points over the last 20,000 years, have higher bird diversity than do oceanic islands. Surprisingly, we found that they do not. Our explanation is that both immigration and extinction rates for birds on islands are higher than for most other taxa, such as lizards and plants, and thus the immigration–extinction equilibrium is reached faster. Immigration rates are higher because birds are effective dispersers; extinction rates may be higher because bird species’ population sizes on islands are typically small. Our results help shed light on the processes that structure species diversity on islands.
What forces structure the diversity of ecological communities on local scales? One perspective is that local niche factors determine how many species can coexist locally. A very different perspective is that local diversity is mainly a function of immigration and regional diversity. Pioneering ecologist Robert MacArthur (1930–1972) made seminal contributions to theory embodying both perspectives. The dichotomy between the two perspectives has thus been termed “MacArthur’s paradox”.
In previous work, we built a unified mathematical model of island biodiversity and showed that increasing immigration with island area drives a transition from niche-structured to immigration-structured communities. The model predicts a biphasic island species–area curve that is commonly seen in nature. In a new paper just out in Theoretical Ecology, we explore this transition in more detail. We modify MacArthur & Wilson’s (1967) classical graphical paradigm of island biogeography to include niches and show that it leads to a biphasic species–area relationship (SAR), consistent with our previous mathematical model (see graph below). We show that three classic mathematical niche models predict a similar SAR when immigration is added. We also reconcile this biphasic island SAR with the classic triphasic SAR seen on mainlands, and predict a tetraphasic SAR in low-diversity mainland systems, with a sampling phase at very small spatial scales and an elusive niche-structured phase at intermediate spatial scales.
By continuing the unification of the niche and immigration perspectives, our work helps resolve MacArthur’s paradox. We propose experiments that manipulate immigration directly to explore the transition between the niche- and immigration-structured regimes. And we propose large-scale data analyses to find the elusive niche-structured phase of the SAR on mainlands.
Several new students have recently joined the lab. Nicolás Firbas is starting his PhD, and is broadly interested in topics relating to mathematical modelling of ecological systems. Guan Tong has rejoined the lab following her successful third-year undergraduate (UROPS) project on modelling the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore; she is now in her Honours year, and will continue this line of research.
In addition, we welcome three students coming to us from the lab of Ted Webb, who is moving to the University of Helsinki. Sean Pang is in the final year of his PhD, and is modelling species distributions of an ensemble of tree species in the tropics. Annabel Lim is starting her Honours project in which she is doing systematic conservation planning for Philippine dipterocarp tree species under future climate change scenarios. Ng Chek Guan is also starting his Honours project, on using species distribution models to map the potential for dragon fruit farming in Nepal.
Many populations in the natural world exhibit pronounced stage structure, with individuals at different life stages having different survival and reproduction rates. Although there is a large literature on stage-structured models for single populations, stage structure has been less well studied in models of entire ecological communities. In our new paper, just published in Oikos, we explored the effect of allowing separate juvenile and adult stages on the dynamics of neutral biodiversity models.
We tested whether the addition of stage structure could fix known problems with spatial neutral models’ ability to fit cross-scale patterns of biodiversity in tropical forest tree communities. It could not, but our investigations led to useful mathematical results and new intuitions that have broad relevance for community ecology.
One particularly surprising result was that the presence of a juvenile stage, in which individuals cannot produce offspring, can substantially increase the biodiversity of the system. This occurs because it effectively increases the length of the historical time interval from which the parents of the current crop of individuals are sampled. The result likely applies beyond neutral models and to ecological communities in the real world.